However, what the US Navy thought they knew about the Yamato was a far cry from what it actually was. The Yamato -class battleships carried nine 18-inch guns in three triple turrets. The could throw 6,000-lb. projectiles just over 26 miles at the rate of 1 to 1.5 rounds per gun per minute. There is very little data regarding their demonstrated accuracy. The Bismarck -class battleships carried eight 15-inch guns in four dual turrets. Yamato and Musashi vs. Missouri and Iowa. It would be a long time before the US had a grasp of the Yamato’s capabilities. Yamato (大和) was the lead ship of her class of battleships built for the Imperial Japanese Navy (IJN) shortly before World War II.She and her sister ship, Musashi, were the heaviest and most powerfully armed battleships ever constructed, displacing 72,800 tonnes at full load and armed with nine 46 cm (18.1 in) Type 94 main guns, which were the largest guns ever mounted on a warship. Bismarck: 800 kg. In the Red Corner, representing the United States Navy. DeviantArt is the world's largest online social community for artists and art enthusiasts, allowing people to connect through the creation and sharing of art. A view of the battleship Yamato as a bomb explodes near her forward 460mm gun turret during the Battle of the Sibuyan Sea on October 20, 1944. Al admirals sweating and betting. Bismarck: 2.4 per minute Arizona: 1.5 per minute As we can check the Bismarck was not only a bigger ship with more horsepower and speed but with better armor and armament. Anyone know the dimensions of the turrets of the bismarck (turret ring, length, depth, etc.) Bismarck midship section coefficient is calculated as follows: CM = 326 m² / (36 m x 9.33 m) = 0.97 5) The waterplane coefficient (CWP) is the ratio of the area of a ship’s waterplane (AWP) to the area of a rectangle (the circumscribing rectangle) of the same length and breadth as the ship. To call this ship huge is an understatement. 3,632. Size: 16" 15" Steam range: 12000 at 18 knots vs. 9280 at 16 knots; For the Bismarck to sink was a Phyrrhic victory without the victory part. The KMS Bismarck is the more … Bismarck: 38,880 yds. F106Delta. Bismarck's armament was the same or better than most of the British battleships with exception of the two nelsons. Bismarck: 2,690 ft/sec. The Yamatos, on the … Arizona: 636.36 kg. They were initially intended to intercept fast capital ships such as the Japanese Kongō class while also being capable of serving in a traditional battle line alongside slower battleships and act as its "fast wing". Battleship Shootout: KM Bismarck vs. USS Iowa vs. IJN Yamato vs. HMS King George V September 28, 2012 in General Topics The battleship , moreso than any kind of warship–excepting perhaps the man O’ war –was often the visual representation of a country’s military might. Once again, try actually reading the report, and this time the section where it talks about Yamato's FCS, and the last section on automatic follow-ups. I'd like to see Yamato/Super Yamato vs the H44 in comparison, that would be neat. The H40A was 65,600 tons while the H40B took it to 70,000 tons, already on par with the Imperial Japanese Navy’s Yamato. Neither the Bismarck nor the Yamato have beyond visual range fighting capabilities. 2,072 [DDMAF] legozer. On 8/23/2016 at 2:39 PM, Panocek said: I'd love to see all ships chart comparison, I guess hightier RU derpstroyers aren't far from cruisers length wise. Return to previous page. Bismarck vs. Yamato: What if Hitler's Biggest Battleship Attacked Japan's Monster Warship? The only real victory was Bismarcks sinking of Hood, which could be called a … Yamato had a standard displacement of c. 64,000 tons and Bismarck had a standard displacement of c. 43,000 tons. A comparison between the main turrets of the Hood, Bismarck and Yamato. Only battleships designed around 1939 and later, or upgraded in 1941 or later, seemed to have been able to hold their own against air attacks.] Some denigrate the Iowa's design as flawed because it was "narrow to fit through the Panama Canal", but the Bismarck was designed to fit through the Kiel Canal. 1. Ask the guys on Yamato. Armor Schemes on W.W.II Battleships. The 18.1″ Turrets were Excellent. For comparison, the Japanese 18.1in/45 gun threw a 3200lb armor piercing shell 45,960 yards. Yes, even against the 18" guns of the Yamato. The only real victory was Bismarcks sinking of Hood, which could be called a … Its armor was proof against ALL other guns. (OMG BS'ING MADNESS!!!) 1. Well … 1. However, what the US Navy thought they knew about the Yamato was a far cry from what it actually was. To call this ship huge is an understatement. Bismarck was superior in speed, 30 knots vs 27 knots. The first two ships, Littorio and Vittorio Veneto, were laid down in the mid 1930s. According to all best information available, the Musashi took more damage when she was sunk on 24th October 1944 compared to the Yamato, which was sunk on the 7th April 1945.. It’s kind of funny how the KGVs, Nelsons and South Dakota class are comparatively small next to ships like Bismarck and Yamato, yet were some of the most successful battleship classes of the war. USS Wisconsin. The Yamatos could only carry nine 18.1in guns on a similar size hull with similar armor and speed. Anonymous says: 2 May 2007 01:04:40 PM You know, its ironic how both the Bismarck and the Yamato were the biggest and most powerful battleships in the war, but really both were a non-factor. Size range XS-2XL, suitable for men and women. The Iowa class were the pinnacle of battleship design. Re : Bismarck/H44 size comparison 02. Also, the Yamato was known to the US Navy at the time of design. Also, the Yamato was known to the US Navy at the time of design. The American gun weighed less, allowing the Montanas to carry 12 of them for a broadside weight of 32,400lbs. I can find only one, albeit disputed, mention of the effectiveness of these shells in combat because the Yamato-class ships saw so little combat. Yamato vs Bismarck, many of you asked for it. Stern view of the Montana model. Valorificarea şi promovarea în spaţiul public, la nivel naţional şi european, a patrimoniului comemorativ, în mod specific al mausoleelor ridicate pentru eroii din Primul Război Mondial, aflate pe teritoriul României. Yamato’s 18-inch main battery would probably enable her to pound Bismarck, which had a 15-inch main battery. At the bottom of the spectrum, King George V 's 14" gun clearly doesn't have nearly the oomph necessary to compete with the rest of these guys. If we consider that Yamato's 18" guns were 45 caliber weapons, and yet still possessed significantly higher muzzle velocity for the shells it fired than the US 50 caliber 16" weapons, then the Japanese seems to have adopted this strategy to a degree also, at least relative to the USN's approach. At full load this increased to about 72,000 tons and 51,000 tons respectively. The Yamato-class vessels were huge at 72,000 tons and carried nine 18-inch guns. Re : Bismarck/H44 size comparison 02. 2006 08:32 PST; obst. Gun turrets of the Fuhrer's 800mm compared to those of the Bismarck and the never built H-39 16 Inch rifles and H-44 20 Inch Rifles. Yamato doesn't have a Type 92 analog computer, though it's nice you recognize its shortcomings. In 1906 the British Royal Navy launched the 18,000 ton HMS Dreadnought. The Truth. The Iowa-class ships were smaller but well balanced at 52,000 tons with a heavy battery of nine 16-inch guns. The Yamato-class vessels were huge at 72,000 tons and carried nine 18-inch guns. The two classes never met in battle but it’s interesting to wonder which one would have won in an engagement. Her hull was 863 feet long—longer than all but America's Iowa -class ships ; Bismarck opens fire on Yamato and Tirpitz on Musashi, with Bismarck scoring an early hit on the Japanese flagship. As the KMS Bismarck was to the Atlantic Theater so too was the IJN Yamato to the Pacific Theater. In real life, which battleship would most likely destroy the living daylights out of the other? Because Germany was never able to create a hoist/rammer system that was compact enough to fit behind the breech, the loading system was placed to the side of the barrel, greatly increasing turret size. These ships would have rivaled the Imperial Japanese Yamato class and America's planned Montana class in size if any had been completed, although with significantly weaker firepower: nine 406-millimeter (16in) guns compared to the nine 460-millimeter (18.1in) guns of the Japanese ships and a dozen 16-inch (406.4 mm) on the Montanas. Footnotes for Best Battleship Page: Guns. 03. 03. CWP = AWP/(L x B) 2006 09:04 PST; ramjb. Link to post Share on other sites. If NC could put a few holes in Yamato quickly, or get some critical hits like in the directors (like Rodney did to the Bismarck very quickly), it's anyone's ball game. Her hull was 863 feet long—longer than all but America's Iowa -class ships ; Bismarck opens fire on Yamato and Tirpitz on Musashi, with Bismarck scoring an early hit on the Japanese flagship. How would the Bismarck have fared were it in American hands and with the Iowa in German hands is an excellent hypothetical question. These ships would have rivaled the Imperial Japanese Yamato class and America's planned Montana class in size if any had been completed, although with significantly weaker firepower: nine 406-millimeter (16in) guns compared to the nine 460-millimeter (18.1in) guns of the Japanese ships and a dozen 16-inch (406.4 mm) on the Montanas. ... She was an amazingly nimble ship her size. The two Yamato-class battleships were several knots slower, a good bit larger, had thicker armor, and bigger guns than the two Bismarck-class battleships.The German ships were more maneuverable. Completion of the Montana class, and the last two Iowa-class battleships, was intended to give the US Navy a considerable advantage over any other nation, or probable combination of nations, with a total of 17 new battleships by the late 1940s. Here we’ll have two small islands, each 300 feet at the highest, each 5X5 miles in size, and each twenty miles apart, arranged roughly on the centerline of a plot of water 40 x 40 miles in size. Size Comparison: Every Major Nation's last battleship class commissioned before the end of WWII Sign in to follow ... the Iowa's profile never evokes a sense of power and intimidation that you get from Bismarck or Yamato, regardless of her actual combat effectiveness. #2. #1. norcalsurfer408;n848768 said: Japanese residents look at the salvaged turret of the IJN battleship Mutsu. Bismarck had battleship armour, 8 x 15inch guns and a top speed of 30 knots, at a time when Britain could only call upon Hood (a 20 year old battlecruisers, with a First World War fire computer and known vulnerabilities) and King George V. That made her a huge threat. https://www.mathscinotes.com/2020/01/battleship-shell-size-comparison The concept was quickly adopted by every major nation that could a… The German squadron has a three-knot speed advantage, which it uses to try to pull away from the Japanese and avoid the engagement. Its revolutionary design heralded the new age of the truly all-powerful “Battleship.” This new breed of battleships had an all steel design with very large caliber guns in rotating turrets. The Bismarck class had eight fifteen-inch guns, each capable of hurling an armor piercing, capped round up to 21.75 miles.

Both the IJN Yamato and Musashi were sunk in combat but there was a third vessel. 03. The Yamato class was the first battleship to utilize 18.1″ guns as well as the first Japanese battleship to carry triple gun turrets for the main battery. Arizona: 34,000 yds. The Iowa-class ships were smaller but well balanced at 52,000 tons with a heavy battery of nine 16-inch guns. Littorio Class (45,485 Long Tons) Specifications (Roma) Laid Down: September 18, 1938 (Littorio: … Yamato is slightly longer and beamier, and maintains a wider beam of a greater part of her length. The Yamato-class battleships carried nine 18-inch guns in three triple turrets.The could throw 6,000-lb. Yamato and Musashi vs. Missouri and Iowa. The Yamato's and USS Iowa's turrets would have been even bigger. Bismarck: 42000 tons Yamato: 64000 tons. I shudder to think of it. The Bismarcks carried about nineteen thousand tons of armor, albeit in an archaic configuration by World War II standards. The Truth. Truth. Bismark is immune to Yamato beyond 35,000 yards vertically and under approxmately 15,000 yards horizontally. Display Comparison of HIJMS Yamato (c.1945) and Yamato/Argo (c.2199) General Space Battleship Yamato Bibliography Read the Space Battleship Yamato F.A.Q. Arizona: 34,000 yds. Let´s have the combat at Okinawa, 1945. Yamato's broadside Curious what ship this is. The Bismarck -class battleships carried eight 15-inch guns in four dual turrets. They could throw 1700-lb. projectiles just over 22 miles at the rate of 2 to 2.5 rounds per gun per minute. They demonstrated the capability of firing with extreme precision. Their shells had a higher velocity, resulting in a much lower arc and a shorter travel time. Bismarck vs. Yamato: What if Hitler's Biggest Battleship Attacked Japan's Monster Warship? Since the navy anticipated they would be unable to produce as many ships as the United States, the Yamato-class ships with their great size and heavy armament were designed to be individually superior to American battleships. Armed with nine powerful 15″ guns and capable of speeds of 30 knots, the Littorio class were among the most powerful battleships of their day. but we saw that in battle, you don’t win on specs. This highly anticipated naval duel is going to be intense. Gotta put those sunbeds and mini bar somewhere. Footnotes for Best Battleship Page: Guns. Missouri, Bismarck, Yamato Graphic T-shirt by Bubi69 Super soft and comfy t-shirt featuring sublimation printed polyester blend front panel, solid color 100% cotton back/sleeves/rib. The Montanas also would have been the only American ships to rival Japan's massive Yamato and her sister Musashi in size and raw firepower. May 10, 2016. Undoubtedly the most powerful battleship ever built, the Yamato was a mammoth ship design bristling with cannon and machine gun power backed up by … 2. Although considered huge when she was commissioned in December 1941 (she was 266 feet longer and 44,000 tons heavier than the USS Texas, which had been commissioned in 1914), by the time she saw action, American battleships of the Iowa … 2. #Júlio In this article, we will look at five great features of the Yamato class battleships! KM FUHRER GUN comparison. Sure, she had 8 15inch high velocity guns. As much as I am fan of the Bismarck, it was a much older designed ship. BY NATHAN OKUN. But wasn't a supership. Aug 9, 2020. After a careful look at the TGC and TWB ratings, some surprising results emerge. Bismarck really wasn't that superior compared to other designs, it was really just on par. F106Delta. Here is the crazy part, the battleship Mutsu is not even in the top 10 list of largest battleships. Yamato Fact File Size Comparison Charts. Share this post. Yamato's Type 98 computer doesn't require any operator intervention, just like that on Iowa. C. chean. Yamato is immune to Bismarck at 25,000 yards or more vertically and at all ranges horizontally. Bismarck had 15 inch guns, the most belt armour that British battleships had was 14 inches while yamato had 16 inches of belt armour. Posted August 23, 2016. Anonymous says: 2 May 2007 01:04:40 PM You know, its ironic how both the Bismarck and the Yamato were the biggest and most powerful battleships in the war, but really both were a non-factor. KM FUHRER GUN comparison. Despite her great size and huge guns, the Yamato simply isn't in the same league as Iowa. H44 never existed, that's an edit to show its projected size. 03. Virginia. But, the Mk VII 16" 50 caliber guns of the Iowa class were also equally able to defeat even the heaviest armor on. Bismarck: 8 x 15"/L47 Arizona: 12 x 14"/45 cal. The German squadron has a three-knot speed advantage, which it uses to try to pull away from the Japanese and avoid the engagement. It didn’t stop there. Also shown is the widt of the ship and the use of the KM Scharnhorst and KM Gneisenau type gun turrets (280mm) as secondary armament. The Yamato front turret armor was 26" thick and in post-war testing, the MK VII rounds ripped through it like cardboard. Bismarck: 800 kg. Name * Email * Website. Before long, the Japanese begin to reply with their 18.1 guns If greatness can be measured by size, Yamato was indeed the greatest battleship ever built. Yamato's armor Belt 16" (with slope 18") Deck 7 1/2". Clear skies, smooth ocean. to a give the bismark a better-than 50% chance of victory, she has to be skippered by the god of war himself. If we consider that Yamato's 18" guns were 45 caliber weapons, and yet still possessed significantly higher muzzle velocity for the shells it fired than the US 50 caliber 16" weapons, then the Japanese seems to have adopted this strategy to a degree also, at least relative to the USN's approach. 2006 09:27 PST; WingHo:O Super Yamato vs H44. Source: Wikimedia Commons via German Federal Archives The KMS Bismarck and the KMS Tripitz, which were the only two ships in the Bismarck Class, were the two largest battleships that Nazi Germany had during World War II.Both ships were about 823 feet 6 inches (251 meters) in length and had a displacement of over 49,500 long tons (50,300 tons). They were initially intended to intercept fast capital ships such as the Japanese Kongō class while also being capable of serving in a traditional battle line alongside slower battleships and act as its "fast wing". No aircraft intervention, just the ships. The Iowa's radar has a small enough … No aircraft intervention, just the ships. Let´s have the combat at Okinawa, 1945. Yamato and Bismarck, size comparison, with the same scale models.... Yamato surpassed the 72,000 tons when loaded, the Bismarck was around 50,300 tons when loaded ... Musashi and Yamato were the only battleships in the world to overcome the 60,000 tons and fit the unofficial classification of "super battleships". Also shown is the widt of the ship and the use of the KM Scharnhorst and KM Gneisenau type gun turrets (280mm) as secondary armament. ... Battleship Comparison Just compare Yamato and Bismark, its Yamato hands down The Iowa class was a class of six fast battleships ordered by the United States Navy in 1939 and 1940. Arizona: 2,700 ft./sec. You can not compare a pre WW2 designed and made ship such as the Bismarck to an Iowa class. The recent discovery by a deep-water remotely controlled submersible of the wreck of the German WWII battleship KM BISMARCK has renewed interest in that ship's capabilities vis-a-vis its battleship contemporaries in other navies at the time. Two 18" superdreadnoughts against the two most modern ones! Truthfully it's not a good game, the Yamato is the bigger better ship. Photo by Ingalls Shipbuilding. The two classes never met in battle but it’s interesting to wonder which one would have won in … Bismarck, as a new, highly advanced warship with state-of-the-art German engineering, was arguably technologically superior to anything in the Royal Navy in 1941. Your email address will not be published. projectiles just over 26 miles at the rate of 1 to 1.5 rounds per gun per minute. F106Delta. F106Delta. The match of interest is the Bismarck class, which had similar main armament to Vanguard, though a generation newer and with a higher rate of fire on paper. ... Re : Bismarck/H44 size comparison 02.

While the British battleships couldn’t score a killing blow on the Bismarck, they did reduce the Bismarck to an inoperable wreck that was finally scuttled by her crew to prevent capture. Graf Spee, despite some inefficient splitting of her main battery between Exeter and the two light cruisers, still managed to devastate the Exeter - although the British ship remained afloat and made it back to harbour. ARMOR PROTECTION OF THE BATTLESHIP KM BISMARCK©. Figure 2: Battleship Shell Size Comparison. Especially Rodney & South Dakota being noticeably smaller than Bismarck, but outgunning it … Bismarck: 2.4 per minute Arizona: 1.5 per minute As we can check the Bismarck was not only a bigger ship with more horsepower and speed but with better armor and armament. Clear skies, smooth ocean. Bookmark the permalink. Battleship Shootout: KM Bismarck vs. USS Iowa vs. IJN Yamato vs. HMS King George V September 28, 2012 in General Topics The battleship , moreso than any kind of warship–excepting perhaps the man O’ war –was often the visual representation of a country’s military might. (Battleship images scanned from Gibbons, "The Complete Encyclopedia of Battleships.") Charlie Re : Bismarck/H44 size comparison 02. Saved by DeviantArt. Plus, at NC's max range, the 2700lb AP's actually have more deck-penetrating power coming out of … Despite being heavily armored, their powerful steam turbines enabled them to be incredibly fast, too. Before long, the Japanese begin to reply with their 18.1 guns Arizona: 636.36 kg. Arizona: 2,700 ft./sec. Iowas potent combo of great speed, adequate armor, highly-effective guns, and excellent fire control lay waste to the Japenese giant by day and especially at night. Here is the more interesting comparison: Yamato or Bismarck. Bismarck's 15"/47 shell is 10% lighter than the French and Italian, although her cyclic rate is attractive, and her guns were very accurate. Bismarck: 2,690 ft/sec. Al admirals sweating and betting. ... How will a cruise missile with a BROACH warhead penetrate Yamato's deck armor? Two 18" superdreadnoughts against the two most modern ones! Yamato's 18.1" guns had weight of broadside more than double Bismarck (28971lbs to 14112), and longer range (45960yds to 38880). Stern view of the Montana model. Whereas the planned H39, which was essentially what Germany planned to build in 1939, was a reasonable 62,500 tons – with each subsequent upgrade the vessels increased in size and capability. Different sources give different numbers of hits on each ship. Neither the Bismarck nor the Yamato have beyond visual range fighting capabilities. Bismarck was a "true" battleship, and IIRC its main belt was not penetrated by either KGV's 14 inchers or Rodney's 16 inchers. Bismarck: 38,880 yds. The ships had a beam of 36 m (118 ft 1 in), and a designed draft of 9.30 m (30 ft 6 in); the draft at standard displacement was 8.63 m (28 ft 4 in), and 9.90 m (32 ft 6 in) at a full load. Required fields are marked * Comment. It would be a long time before the US had a grasp of the Yamato’s capabilities. This article is an analysis of the armor protection designed … (OMG BS'ING MADNESS!!!) Without any delay, let us begin. This entry was posted in Uncategorized by John Anderson. I shudder to think of it. She's also slightly slower, has thicker armour and heavier guns, which all drive up the displacement. This ensures the ships can maneuver somewhat, but the terrain won’t be a deciding factor. The Bismarck -class battleships were 251 m (823 ft 6 in) long overall and 241.60 m (792 ft 8 in) long at the waterline. Shot out of a 3x3 main battery with an 18in caliber gun. The Iowa class was a class of six fast battleships ordered by the United States Navy in 1939 and 1940. 03. As the KMS Bismarck was to the Atlantic Theater so too was the IJN Yamato to the Pacific Theater. Drawn primarily from John Campbell's Naval Weapons of World War II, but also from Dulin & Garzke, various Warship International issues, and additional unpublished material from Nathan Okun. In operation Tengo, the US really only started to be successful with their torpedo attacks after the dive bombers had degraded her propulsion system. Leave a Reply Cancel reply. Well … Re : Bismarck/H44 size comparison 02. As some of you may recall, the first edition of this page featured a three-way race between Bismarck, Yamato and Iowa.I received quite a volume of e-mail from overseas (including some from Germany, surprise, surprise...) debating various points of contention. The Comparative Turret Layout of the IJN Yamato by Tzoli on DeviantArt. Yamato was more heavily armored, belt 16-inches, deck 7.9 to 8.9 - inch, turret (facing) 25.6-inches. INTRODUCTION. 2006 09:27 PST; WingHo:O Super Yamato vs H44. Tashkent is roughly the same size as tier 6 cruisers, it's only 8m shorter than Leander! With that being said Bismarck was superior to … Note that the Yamato has 9 guns throwing hells that weigh in at over 1,400 KG while Bismarck has 8 firing shells that weigh in at 800 KG. The Iowa's radar has a small enough … Two more ships, Roma and Impero, were later authorized with only Roma being completed. ... You can see around this ship other large shipping container ships pale in comparison to size. IOWA class battleship turrets varied in face thickness slightly, due to the manufacturer's limitations. On the face of it there is no comparison. The mid-1939 Vanguard design had similar armour to King George V, although there is little data on how this might have performed.During the battle of the Denmark Strait in May 1941, Prince of Wales was hit by Bismarck, … Drawn primarily from John Campbell's Naval Weapons of World War II, but also from Dulin & Garzke, various Warship International issues, and additional unpublished material from Nathan Okun. Iowa wins 1 on 1 against Bismarck and 1 on 1 against Yamato. Undoubtedly the most powerful battleship ever built, the Yamato was a mammoth ship design bristling with cannon and machine gun power backed up by … 1k. ( Source) The Yamato-class battleships used the 18.1-inch shells.
Side Effects Of Zinc Oxide Cream, Man City Money Spent Since 2013, Outdoor Furniture Hamptons Ny, Finv Stock Forecast 2025, Urban Nerds Collective, Football Federation Of Armenia, Restaurants In White Rock,